Thanks to Obama’s rising interest rates and perpetual unconstitutional government control, only the massive corporations are able to sustain themselves and they end up having to pay more and more to the government. So all the smaller businesses have to lay off employees (on top of the government laying off employees), so it only increases the level of unemployment, which is ironically what Obama and the Democrats wanted to avoid.

Meanwhile, John Doe who was fired by Med Whitman, figures out that he needs to cost cut (because he also has to pay massive amounts of taxes to the feds) so he doesn’t go to that local bar anymore every other night.

So that local bar is loosing money on John Doe and everyone else that has since become unemployed. That local bar also has to pay higher interest rates and conform to more and more unconstitutional provisions that restrict the money from flowing.

Therefore, while more money goes to the state, the taxes still remain in place so none of it ends up going back to the people while the government continues to irresponsibly use this money to do next to nothing with it, and the money doesn’t flow. And with Obamacare casting an overarching shadow upon the future of the debt crisis, the American citizens will have to pay even more money that they don’t have while the government is spending even more that they don’t have. So if you think that will be good for the economy then #######-

It’s an economic paradox what Obama has been doing, and if he’s proven anything it’s that a state economic system is flawed, and that any government intervention in the crisis will only make it worse.

It’s a common misconception that you have to be a social conservative to be a republican. Or that you’re voting against yourself if you’re in the working class when you vote republican. (Although let me state that I by no means endorse Kit Romney)